In this instalment Wayne helps Mikhi learn a little more about the Web, Social Media, and, how it fits into modern religious trends---. &&&&
Wayne
sent Mikhi a list of You Tube links with the strong recommendation he
force himself to watch at least some of them. Mikhi started with one
from a fellow in Missouri that he choose because it was only only 45
minutes long. Most went on for around an hour and a half---but a few
were even longer.
The
first image was a middle-aged man who was wearing a t-shirt and a
ball cap put on backwards. He had a water bottle with some coloured
fluid in it that he repeatedly sipped during the entire video. The
first 4 minutes consisted of him repeatedly announcing that he had a
“great show tonight” while a country and Western song blasted
over his voice. Eventually the music ended. Then the narrator went on
and on for another five minutes about how he is just an “ordinary
guy” who wants the same as “everyone else”---mainly a job that
would last long enough to pay off the mortgage on his house. He also
announced that he cared just as deeply about nature as anyone, but
he’d seen a video of a professor who argued that there was no such
thing as climate change. He just wanted to make sure all points of
view had been considered before the government did anything that
would threaten the “rural way of life”. Then for the next ten
minutes he complained about how “one-sided” and “slick” the
Climate Trials had been, and why there hadn’t been any
“ordinary folks” involved with them, “just so-called
intellectuals who’d obviously never worked at tough, physical job
in their entire life”. (Mikhi thought to himself “If only. Then
maybe my joints wouldn’t hurt so much when I get up in the
morning”.) Then the blabfest went on another particularly tedious
20 minutes where he read out loud a letter his local representative
in Congress had sent him in response to a question he’d had about
the latest carbon tax proposal. This ended with at least 5 minutes of
uninterrupted blather that actually said nothing at all, but was
peppered with phrases like “when the shit hits the fan” people
will finally “find out where the truth really lies”.
At
the end of this Mikhi was so bored he thought he would prefer to
pound nails into his skull over watching another one of these tedious
rants. Then his analytic mind kicked in. He was surprised to realize
that he couldn’t really find anything that even remotely looked
like an argument in the video. Instead, a bunch of random assertions
were jumbled together with a lot of emotional statements about how
“ordinary people” were upset with what the “elites” were
doing to them. Bookchin looked at the number of views on the channel.
Astonishingly, it had already received 10,000 views since it was
posted last Thursday.
He
contrasted that with his news blog that he’d toiled at for over
five years. He’d been happy to get 1500 views a month. It dealt
with hard news of local interest, though. That meant that he’d had
to spend hours almost every day researching, doing interviews,
attending events, taking pictures, etc. Of course the Climate Trials
had had billions of hits already---but it had the support of the
Elders, and they had tremendous resources to bring to bear. This guy
had obviously just pulled this video out of his ass, and yet he had
wildly out-performed Bookchin’s labour of love. And from the long
list of video links that Wayne sent him, it appeared that there were
hundreds---if not thousands---of channels just like the one he’d
just forced himself to watch.
Just what the Hell is
happening on line?
&&&&
The
next video Mikhi watched was about creatures called “reptoids”
from the star system Alpha Draconis who have infiltrated the
earth using their advanced technology to impersonate human beings.
This particular example purported to be of a “Draconian” who was
in the security detail at a speech given by President Obama in
Israel. The man in question was especially thin and seemed to have
some illness that had effectively rendered him hairless. These
features plus the poor quality of the extremely magnified screen
capture and a trick of the shadows created a strange image that an
active imagination could interpret as showing “reptilian”
features.
An
extremely emotionless and flat (Mikhi was half-wondering if the
narration was machine-generated) voice-over suggested that this
person was a Lizard man who was having problems with his high-tech
camouflage.
Mikhail
had a hard time understanding this and the other videos he’d seen,
so he emailed Wayne and asked him what he thought was going on.
&&&&
I was listening to a post on Canadaland today where a story about Ryerson University's journalism program came up. Jesse Brown suggested that the future of the trade isn't going to be working for a large corporation like Torstar but rather little "mom and pop" news outlets---like Convenience stores. Well, this is Bill's "Kwiky Mart" of news. Help yourself, but if you can please subscribe so we can afford to get the roof fixed and the windows washed. It's easy to do through Pay Pal and Patreon.
&&&&
He
got one of those explanatory essays that the Elders sometimes sent
him to explain complex subjects.
In order to understand the explosion of conspiracy theories people
need to acquaint themselves with several key concepts and how they
are interacting in the current world. The first one is religious
faith and it’s decline and replacement by epistemological
nihilism.
The Abrahamic religions---Judaism, Christianity, and, Islam---are
somewhat unique in human civilization. That’s because they are
spiritual systems based upon a historical revelation instead
of on-going personal inspiration (such as Hinduism, Buddhism,
Daoism, Shamanism, Stoicism, science, etc.) This means that belief in
an actual historical event, such as the revelation of Allah to
Mohamed, is absolutely core to the entire religious system. But that
requires individuals to believe, as an actual historical fact,
the angel Gabriel met an individual named Mohamed and revealed the
divine truth to him which he wrote down in the Koran.
This is different from other worldviews, which suggest that there are
universal human experiences that every human being can experience if
they followed certain mental practices and which provide important
insights into how best to live. Because individual members of the
Abrahamic religions have no personal access to base their belief
upon, they must take the word of historical figures on faith instead.
Most other paths, in contrast, suggest that someone needs to find the
truth for themselves. This makes the “leap of faith” a peculiarly
Western religious concept.
Modern history has been steadily “whittling away” at the
“reasonableness” of this demand. Science has undermined the idea
there is such a thing as a Supreme Being who directly intervenes in
the life of the world. At the same time, human society has advanced
beyond the point where it makes sense for people to submit to a
higher authority instead of collectively deciding the best way to
live. Saying “God did it”, and, “do it because God says so”
is easier to accept if people know almost nothing about the world
around them and everything else in your life is done “because the
local aristocrat says so”.
Religion protects itself from the corrosive effects of scientific
discovery and the expansion of human rights by creating a thought
process that it calls faith. At its essence, this is a
learned behaviour that involves using one’s willpower to
short-circuit their ability to critically exam and discard fallacious
reasoning. It’s important to realize that we aren’t just talking
about things like virgin births, life after death, or, miracles.
There are also the ideas that people shouldn’t vaccinate their children,
should actively discriminate against women or gays, and, support
specific political parties that treat immigrants and poor badly.
This whole worldview is only sustainable if individual parishioners
are forbidden to use their own moral intuition. If they did, it might
suggest that the behaviours promoted by their denomination are not
congruent with the wishes of a just and/or loving deity. Religious
faith isn’t just a particular idea that an individual holds onto,
it is an on-going battle against a human being’s natural tendency
to use reason, evidence, and, their own understanding of right
and wrong to make sense of the world around him.
Unfortunately for the Abrahamic religions, religious faith (at least
in the modern, industrially-developed parts of the world) is in
decline. The fastest growing religious affiliation in the United
States, Canada, Europe, and, most technologically-advanced parts of
Asia is the “none” category. That is, no religious affiliation at
all. And contrary to what you might have heard, the category of
religious believers known as “conservative evangelicals” are in
the steepest decline of all.
This last point is masked by the fact that when church bodies fill
out census forms they only add new members of the congregation and
never subtract ones who have left. Add this to the fact that
evangelicals tend to have the highest numbers of “church shoppers”
going from congregation to congregation, and you end up with the
illusion of very large, fast growing denominations. The fact is the
demographics skew heavily towards the elderly and many churches only
keep themselves financially afloat because of legacies left by
dying---and never to be replaced---parishioners.
Unfortunately, this religious faith is not being universally replaced
by enlightened rationalism. Instead, in a small but still significant
number of cases the void is filled by epistemological nihilism.
That’s the idea that there really isn’t any such thing as truth
at all, so there’s no sense even trying to think rationally about
issues. Of course, almost no one will articulate this viewpoint in
such stark terms. (Indeed, being able to do so would
require a depth of insight that might render the individual incapable
of actually being an epistemological nihilist.)
Instead, they find themselves attracted to subcultures where no
attempt is made to converse rationally. What they like about these
subcultures is specifically the thing that most rational human beings
would find most repellent: the fact that emotional statements
(usually negative) get repeated over and over again without any
attempt to justify them using real evidence or a rational argument.
It’s important to understand the relationship between communities
of “faith” and epistemological nihilists. They don’t map onto
each other exactly, but they have enough in common that historically
the strong influence that the former exerted on society hid the
existence of the latter. That is to say, conservative religious faith
communities were attractive to epistemological nihilists because they
often held the same point of view (anti-vaxer, racist, misogynistic,
distrust of experts, etc) but held them under control within their
geographic or ecclesiastic community. And religious communities are
to a lesser extent epistemological nihilists themselves insofar as
they discourage members from using rational or ethical analysis to
scrutinize the articles of faith that the community is based upon.
It might be useful to compare religious ritual to something like
Twitter in order to understand the above point. Religious
congregations self-select, just like Twitter feeds. This ensures that
people have diminished exposure to different points of view, which
encourages “group think”. A congregation controls the structure
of conversation in ways that limits opportunities to expand people’s
personal insight. For example, when have you ever seen a priest or
pastor ask the congregation if they have any questions after giving a
sermon? Similarly, religious ritual is designed specifically to
encourage the emotions while discouraging self-analysis. In the same
vein, Twitter limits intelligent discussion through the extreme
shortness of tweets. It also encourages appeals to emotions by
allowing videos, graphic images, and, GIFs (which presumably would
use more bandwidth than longer tweets). Just like in churches where
“smells and bells” bypass the rational mind, during a pandemic a
GIF of a medical mask on a woman morphing into a burka emotionally
suggests that public health measures are part of conspiracy to impose
Islam on the Western world without having to provide any evidence
supporting such an outlandish claim.
It bears asking whether or not social media did any of this on
purpose. I suspect not, but it should be remembered that social
media’s goal has never been that of fostering
genuine human connections. Instead, it has always been about
raising money through the advertising industry. And advertising has
never been about rational discourse. Instead, it uses emotional
appeal. It’s important to understand this relationship if a casual
observer wants to understand why it is social media is so opposed to
any changes that would foster rational discourse instead of
discouraging it.
This is where social media and the way the artificial intelligence
programs filter people into “bubbles” of like-minded individuals
comes into play. The folks I am talking about aren’t seeking
rational arguments to tell them what they should believe. Instead,
these individuals already know what they believe and don’t have any
interest at all in having these beliefs challenged. They want to find
other, like-minded individuals where they they can all bask in some
semblance of agreement.
It’s important to understand the appeal. In every geographic
community there exist a very small portion of the population
who---for one reason or another---believe in very unpopular ideas.
They can be out-and-out racists, homophobes, women haters, extreme
libertarians, anti-vaxxers, etc. These are the people who used to put
photocopied sheets of paper espousing racist slogans under the wiper
blades of cars in parking lots and spray-painted swastikas on the
walls of synagogues. Then they were annoying but generally harmless.
But they have found each other on the Internet and created an
artificial simulation of solidarity through social media. This is the
first place they’ve been in most of their lives where they can be
open and honest about what they think without having to “pipe down”
because the majority of people think they are idiots.
It’s also important to understand the limitations of this
community. These people actually don’t have that much in common.
The people frothing at the mouth over chem trails don’t believe
that the Rothschild’s planned the 9/11 attacks. And the ones who
want to incite a race war have very little in common with the people
who believe that vaccinations allow Bill Gates to plant tracking
devices. This means that their “conversations” have to adhere to
very strict, unspoken rules. If people were to stray from them,
cognitive dissonance would build up and people would have to confront
the fact that they have almost nothing in common. This would destroy
the tentative “pseudo-community” that social media has created
for them. And this would put them back into the sort of social
isolation that they suffer in their geographic communities---which
for most of them would be extremely frustrating.
This new community---and the unspoken rules that allow it to
thrive---have caused them to develop their own idiosyncratic ways of
structuring communications. For example, when someone who believes in
climate change decides to buy an electric car or insulates their home
in order to lower their personal carbon emissions, this isn’t
“leading by example” but rather “virtue signalling”. When
someone suggests that making racist or homophobic statements insults
people of colour or gays, this isn’t being “polite to other
people” but rather “attacking free speech”. And when poor or
marginalized people get some assistance from the government, this
isn’t “helping people who are disadvantaged”, it’s “jumping
ahead in line”.
Within these groups there are smaller cliques who believe that there
are advantages in “playing” the majority. White nationalists hang
around groups that get together to make fun of “normies” and toss
out vaguely racist lines once in a while. If they get called to task
by the majority, they can just say that they were being “ironic”
and suggest that people “can’t get a joke”. By doing so, they
are trying to “normalize” racist statements and find the odd
person that might be interested in more overt messages and can be
channelled to their main messaging system. Lonely young men look at
boards that are part of the “pick-up artist” community and the
same process finds the most distressed and channels them towards
“Incel” groups. “Skeptic” groups attract youth who feel that
“politically correct” notions about Islamophobia and “white
privilege” are putting them behind the eight-ball are a fertile
ground to find the odd individual who is willing to take the next
step towards conservative populism and white nationalism.
Add all these people together and all you have is a tiny fraction of
the public, but unfortunately they are still capable of creating a
great deal of havoc in society. That’s because the
emerging global village is so huge that even a tiny
fraction of the public is big enough to support a
substantial financial and cultural infrastructure.
Once you get on-line and within an extremist discussion forum, you
are surrounded by many like-minded individuals. And these people have
no qualms at all about “egging on” each other.
Moreover, each individual on social media is a total cipher. Outside
of a geographic community where someone “carries their past history
on their shoulder”, or even in a face-to-face meeting where you
have the opportunity to check out someone’s non-verbal signals,
communications that happen only through written media on places like
Twitter, Face Book, or, Gab share only what the individual
chooses. That’s how a twelve year old boy in Estonia managed
to become the leader of one of the largest American on-line Neo-Nazi
organizations three years ago. Before he was “outed” member of this
group committed several murders and were the targets of a huge FBI
manhunt, yet it was directed by a child
living in another country!
Many people have dismissed most of this activity as harmless idiocy.
But the fact of the matter is that there are consequences. A mass
murderer in New Zealand who live-streamed his rampage is found to
have been inspired by another killer in Quebec who posted a written
manifesto. A young misogynist in California videotaped himself
preparing to murder six young women and another in Toronto pays
homage to him on 4Chan before he drove down a sidewalk and killed
another 26 women. A Norwegian who spent a couple years avidly reading
American white nationalist forums decided to bring bombs and weapons
to a left-wing political party youth camp and murdered a whole
generation of politically-active teens.
&&&&
Moreover I say unto you, the Climate Emergency must be dealt with!